Reference number:

Budget line:

BG 0010

Main Applicant (country):

Bulgaria

Partner 1 (country)

Partner 2 (country)

Partner . (country)

Title of Project:

Region(s) or countries targeted:

Amount requested (and % of total):

________ EUR ( ___%)

Duration:

___ months

Section

Score

Application Form

1. Relevance

How relevant is the proposal to the Programme priorities? Note: A score of 5 will only be allocated if the project addresses at least 1 priority.

/2 x 5 =

I.1.5

I.6.(f), (g)

How relevant is the proposal to the needs and constraints of Bulgaria?

I.1.6(a)

How clearly defined and strategically chosen are the target groups and the beneficiaries?

I.1.6(b), (c

How relevant is the proposal to the needs of the proposed target groups?

I.1.6(d), (e)

How coherent, appropriate and practical are the activities proposed?

I.1.7

To what extent does the proposal contain innovative approaches, models for good practice, promotion of gender equality and equal opportunities?

General

Comments

2. Methodology

2.1 How coherent is the overall project design?

I.1.8

2.2 How satisfactory is the level of involvement and activity of the partners?   Note: For micro-projects, If there are no partner(s) the score will be 1

I.1.8(f), (g)

2.3 How appropriate and practical are the activities proposed? How clear and feasible is the plan of action?

I.1.9

2.4 How satisfactory is the level of community involvement and co-operation with other institutions (regardless of co-operation with the partner)?

I.1.8 (h)

2.5 To what extent does the proposal contain objectively verifiable indicators for project outcomes? How feasible are results of the project?

Logframe

Comments

3. Sustainability

3.1 To what extent is the project likely to have a tangible impact on its target groups?

I.2.1

3.2 To what extent does the proposal contain potential multiplier effects? (Including possibilities for replication and extension of project outcomes, dissemination of information.)

I.2.3

3.3 To what extent are the results of the proposed project sustainable:

financially (how will the activities be financed after the EC funding ends?)

institutionally (Will structures allowing the activities to continue be in place at the end of the present project? Will there be local "ownership" of project outcomes?)

at the policy level (where applicable) (what will be the structural impact of the project - e.g. will it lead to improved legislation, codes of conduct, methods)

I.2.4

Comments

4. Budget and Cost-effectiveness

To what extent is the budget clear and detailed?

I.3, Budget

4.2 To what extent is the proposed expenditure necessary for the implementation of the project?

I.3, Budget

Comments

5. Management Capacity and Expertise

5.1 How satisfactory is the previous project management experience of the applicant? Note: if the applicant has no previous project management experience, the score will be 1.

II.4, II.5

5.2 How satisfactory is the technical expertise of the applicant?

(I.e. knowledge of the issues to be addressed.)

II.4.1

CVs

5.3 How satisfactory is the current management capacity of the applicant (including staff, equipment and its ability to handle the project budget)?

II.4.2

CVs

Comments

6. Total Score and Recommendations

Score

6.1 Relevance

6.2 Methodology

6.3 Sustainability

6.4 Budget and Cost-effectiveness

6.5 Management Capacity and Expertise

TOTAL:

Recommendation:

Not Selected: